Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Carolyn Hax: Respect daughter’s wedding plans

Washington Post

Dear Carolyn: Our daughter is in her early 30s and is engaged. She wants a small wedding, but we would like to include family and close friends. She and her fiance recently moved far away and want the wedding to be in their new location. They love their new environment, plus the distance will help them keep it small. (Some family and friends will not be able to travel for cost and health reasons.)

Before they moved, we offered to pay for the wedding and reception. However, it does not feel right to be hosting a wedding that many of our family and friends cannot attend. We realize this is our daughter’s and her fiance’s wedding, but we are trying to find a solution with which we can all feel happy. What do you suggest? – Wanting to Do the Right Thing

The “right thing” is to respect the decision these two adults have made, so what you’re wanting, actually, is to have your values prevail over the couple’s.

You can certainly ask your daughter to consider the feelings of those they’re de facto excluding. Beyond that, though, you and I both know there’s no magic adult-autonomy bypass that allows you to overrule the bride and groom.

Unless, of course, you choose to use your freely offered money as leverage – but that would be tantamount to declaring war on your daughter in the name of family unity, the absurdity of which I hope explains itself.

I realize you have good intentions, or believe you do, in choosing inclusion as your top priority for this wedding. But being on the side of the angels is beside the point; it’s not your wedding so you don’t get to have priorities for it, period.

So support your daughter, celebrate her happiness and take at least some comfort in this: Their wanting an intimate wedding in their new surroundings sounds like a confident, mature and hopeful way to start their lives together.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com.