Stars shine spotlight on others
Diane Lane recently made a drastic change with one of her most valuable assets: her hair.
On “Today,” Lane – smiling, but wincing – got a haircut, losing eight inches of her long, sandy-hued locks.
Why? To donate the shorn hair to a charity that gives wigs to women battling cancer.
“On a personal level, it was kind of hard to top as an adrenaline rush,” says Lane, sporting a sleek, brand-new bob.
“But, really, it’s a great relief to know it’s not really about the hairdo I’m left with. It’s more about where the hair that’s gone went.”
More and more celebrities are giving millions, even billions, to charity and taking up humanitarian causes. They’re also drumming up media attention to get the message out – and that’s not to mention their work for political candidates and their campaigns.
What’s the motive for this high-profile philanthropy?
“I think we’re finding a new era in which as more do it, more will put it on their agenda,” says Paul Schervish, director of the Boston College Center on Wealth and Philanthropy. “That is, they will be responding to social expectations.”
Those expectations are being set by A-listers such as Angelina Jolie, a goodwill ambassador for the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.
Her passion for the plight of refugees and other issues has helped encourage celebrity activism, says Marc Pollick, the director of The Giving Back Fund, a nonprofit organization that mentors celebrities about philanthropy.
Jolie and beau Brad Pitt, perhaps the world’s foremost activist couple, sold the first picture of daughter Shiloh to People magazine, saying all proceeds would be donated to charity. They recently gave $300,000 to help government-run hospitals in Namibia, where Shiloh was born.
When Jolie, who uses her star wattage to lure the media’s spotlight to impoverished corners of the globe, gets praised for her efforts, her peers feel compelled – even pressured – to do the same.
“Others are saying, ‘Gee, this is a great thing to do and look at all the good it produces,’ ” Pollick says. “And it’s good on a number of levels. And so I think the copycat behavior is fabulous. It’s sort of a tide rising all the boats.”
Oprah Winfrey is the only show-biz celebrity to rank, at No. 22, on Slate.com’s 2005 list of the top 60 donors to charity.
But that doesn’t mean the stars aren’t stepping up. Nicolas Cage recently pledged $2 million to help former child soldiers around the world. Action star Jackie Chan intends to dispense half his wealth – that’s $128 million, he estimates – to charity.
Celebrity activism is nothing new. Jerry Lewis has hosted his Muscular Dystrophy Association telethon for 40 years. Paul Newman, through his Newman’s Own line of food products, has raised more than $200 million for charity since 1982.
“This is a kind of philanthropy that existed a long time,” says Boston College’s Schervish, “but as all forms of philanthropy now are becoming more prominent – donations and the people involved are becoming more substantial – this has taken on a life of its own and has become something that celebrities are compared with each other about how much they’re doing.”
Stars do seek similar recognition for their charity work, Pollick notes.
“They’re competitive,” he says. “It’s a good thing. … And it”s worked. They have become role models.”
Many stepped forward after three events: Sept. 11, 2001, the Indian Ocean tsunami and Hurricane Katrina.
After the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, a celebrity-driven telethon helped raise $200 million in three months for victim relief and related efforts.
Two star-studded televised concerts – NBC’s “Concert of Hope” to aid tsunami victims, and “Shelter from the Storm,” aired by six networks after Katrina ravaged the Gulf Coast – raised a total of nearly $50 million.